I do get that, for some women, infertility is a major sorrow in their lives. They want to be mothers, but, physically, it just isn't possible. For those women, and their husband, adoption is also not possible. Unless they have a LOT of money to spend, legally adopting a child is hard. It's made harder by social workers who oppose adoption if a parent is living, however ill-suited they are to raise that child. Too often, that opposition keeps children in foster care for years. Some have accused agencies of keeping kids in foster care for the money it brings in - I can't believe that. I think it's an ideological position that is to blame. For those reasons, some women feel that they have no alternative to surrogacy. Today's surrogacy has evolved into a multi-partner process, that splits the pregnancy action into parts: The male contribution - sometimes from the prospective adoptive father, other times from donors (the men are generally paid for their sperm). ...