More on the Politically-Charged Spying 'Game'

This is one of the most lucid explanations of the current situation, and what it all means.

TECHNICALLY, Obama and the senior officials might not have been guilty of a crime, 'only' an abuse of power.

That's like saying, TECHNICALLY, Capone wasn't guilty of racketeering. He was 'only' guilty of tax evasion.

People of character still considered him a dirty, vicious, thuggish head of a criminal enterprise - who was not above getting his hands in the mess.

That should be the legacy of Obama - head of a dirty, vicious, thuggish group of criminals.  He should be shunned by decent people.

Share

Wiretapping? Or Just Politics As Usual, For Liberals

To hear the disgust that Liberals hold for politicians that use the Executive powers for snooping on their political enemies, just ask them about Nixon. Stand back, for the spittle-laced rage has not abated in 34 years.

Then, ask them what they think about the Obama administration's use of covertly-acquired information about Donald Trump.

Crickets.

Or, worse, a defense.

Now, was it TECHNICALLY wiretapping? It may not have fit that definition, but it WAS covert. More importantly, SOME of the people involved in the process did release personal information about an American citizen, against law and bureaucratic policy.

THAT'S why an investigation of the episode is warranted.

Share